To E-mail this web page
after it is completely loaded
Left click on File
Left click on Send
Left click on Page by E-mail
==================================================
Negro racist vs the K.K.K. Who is the real super race?
When you look at an albino, the eyes are a dead give away, so I altered the eyes here. No matter if this is the original way they were or if they were different, I went over them with a replacement color. In the picture below you will not be able to tell by eye color.
I have been debating with what appears
to be a white supremacist except he is black. His words sound very similar to
the KKK (in reverse).
He tells me their is a very old Negro woman (over a million) which proves every
one came from Negroes.
He tells me forensic science is a joke and scientist can't actually tell race from
forensic science.
When a body remains in the elements it will change colors. If it gets past the
rotten stage (preserved by something) the body and hair will change colors. If
found in some substance it will turn black (no matter what the original race)
and if it is a dry heat, the hair and skin will be bleached almost white.
Most of the ancient skeletons have no flesh on them, just a pile of bones.
* He tells us they can't tell race by
skeletons, but from this skeleton he agrees with them the woman is a 1.3 year
old Negro woman.
* He says the first people came from Africa but his old dead woman was
found in France... my, my this is hurting my head.
He tells us there is no difference in "white" men and Negroes except
the color of the skin.
Of course if you begin with the Negroes in the Americas or Europe who the
Europeans have been popping for centuries, there is little or no difference in
the faces.
The daughter of OJ has facial features
similar to Europeans. Sally Hemmings (I think) Jefferson's girl friend was
believed to be a half breed before Jefferson took her to the wood shed.
When you make your anthropology study, you must find heads (with or with out
skin) in an isolated area or from a time period before Europeans polluted their
gene pool.
The Neanderthals lived in from western
Europe through central Asia from about 200,000 years ago.
The name Neanderthal comes from fossils found in
1856 in the Feldhofer Cave of the Neander Valley in
Germany .
Ah hah ... Now look at the skulls of the Neandertal men and place it by modern
man.... Then look at the skeleton of the "1.3" year old "woman"
and her height. It is nothing but a monkey!
Here I have a picture of 3 gentlemen who got here by his evolution story. Two of them are albinos native of Africa and the other is not a native of Africa.
* How hard is it to tell which two are natives of Africa?
* Of the two
that are from Africa, how
hard is it to tell them apart from nothing other than the shapes of their
skulls?
Negroes are not just Negroes because the color of their skin, skin thickness,
skull shapes, hair and biological differences is what separates them and all
other races from each other. It is easy to tell the albino ape from the albino
Negro by the shape of his face as it is easy to tell the Negro from the European
by the shapes of their face. Of course if you believe the evolution story mixed
with the bible, the picture of the guy in the green shirt is taken from a Polaroid
of Adam.
***
The 'Jew" KKK or I mean the "Negro Jew" NNN .. racist cult vs racis cult
Perhaps in your farce "Judaism" where your Blabbis concoct the Talmud, your cult congregation believes you are from monkeys. Well God did not give Israel to monkeys, he gave it to the descendants of the Israelites, who are now a mix of Arabs, Negroes, white Europeans and an array of other people living in the middle east.
If you want to find the heirs of The Promise Land, you will find them to be an array of races in the middle east. They are identified as Arabs by the mass population of the world. You can make up your own name, but they are In Northern Sudan, Egypt, India, Iraq, Iran, Turkey, Lebanon, Syria, Palestine/(mock Israel), Jordan and Saudi Arabia. These lands are the named lands they will be gathered from when God returns to earth.
As for your congregation who believes they are from
monkeys, they can search for their ancestors in the banana trees...
Evil counteR GROUP
Negro black supremacist: "Your Christian Identity and KKK are liars. Adam was not a white man, he was an ape. Scientist has found a series of skulls in the chain of evolution in which apes, evolved to Negroes and white men are just a mutation of Negroes.

The N.N.N. organization calls for all Negroes of the world to unite. We are the chosen, we are the real descendants of the Israelites.
Whites, Spanish, Orientals, all you lowly goyim of the earth were only put here to serve us. Being a Negro does not make you a representative of all Negroes no more than the KKK represents white Christians.
No other cult on earth hate and deny the existence of the Arabs and their identity other than the cult of false Jews... (who say similar things about Christ that they say about Arabs). They must deny the Arabs because it exposes the filthy lie that pretend 'Jews" are the descendants of the Israelites.
There is not a Negro Christian nor Negro Muslim I have ever encountered who believes the monkey man crock. The Negroes I have came across would feel sorry for you, pray for you or call you an idiot. Even the non-religious, hell raising secular Negroes I have worked with would call you an idiot.
Negro 'Jews" who want to push your monkey man story and mix it with the bible, look to the congregation of Talmudist. These brainwashed Lemmings will swallow any turd you feed them.
I have never ran across a Negro who associated Negroes with monkeys before. It is my guess you are a white European "Jew" or one of their suckers who would stir up strife between Arabs and other races. It makes your skin crawl for the world to know these middle east people are the real descendants of the players in the bible.
***
The original
Israelites were Arabs who encountered Negroes while in captivity in Egypt.
The Israelites were nothing but a pot luck of Arabs from the very start.
Isaac was sent to marry a Syrian .. NO problem.
Jacob produced his children with 4 Syrians .. NO
problem
Judah and Simeon produced their children with Canaanites..
NO problem
Abraham n Sarah Chaldeans (ancient Iraqis) ... NO
problem
Moses married a Saudi Arabian (Midianite) .. NO
problem
Joseph married an Egyptian girl.. NO problem
The Israelites murdered thousands of Arab families and kept 32,000 Midianite
virgins.. NO problem.
By the time the Israelites came out of Egypt they were NOTHING but a composite
of every native of the middle east they encountered.
There was NO problem that they married the native people
of the middle east because that was all they were themselves... But
what happened when Moses married a Cushite?
The actual word here is Cushite, though the descendants of Cush were scattered
through out the middle east, the only people identified as Cushites were from
the kingdom of Cush (southern
Egypt to northern Sudan) ... Look today and see what race they belong to.
NUMBERS 12:1 And Miriam and Aaron spoke against Moses because of the Cushite
woman whom he had married: for he had married an Cushite woman.
a) They spoke against the woman because something she did wrong?
b) They spoke against Moses BECAUSE HE TOOK A CUSHITE..
What is the reason they spoke against Moses?
The Israelites took all the other natives of the middle east and there is NO
problem, but when Moses married a Cushite ... there was an outrage !
No problem when Moses married a Midiaite..
but when Moses married a Cushite
it causes OUTRAGE !!!
So what is different in a Cushite than any of the other natives of the middle east the Israelites had married?
These blacks are not stupid, their racist agenda only promotes their lies. The fact is the Cushites were Negroes... the Israelites married all the natives around them but when Moses hooked up with a Cushite, it caused outrage.
Of course today the Israelite population is a blend of Arabs and Negroes who live in the middle east.
***
The guy claiming to be an African then gave me some web pages in his
"proof" of Indians being descendants of Negroes. It was nothing more
than Negroes dressed up like native Americans.. and all of his pictures were colored
pictures.
I have also seen pictures of Native Americans on
reservations with little fair skin, toe head kids running around. I guess that
would prove native Americans are descendants of blond hair Swedes.
If you want to dress up someone and then say that proves these people are the
forefathers of the Native Americans then the Native Americans must be
descendants of white Germans. Here is a picture of Einstein having his picture
taken while on vacation.

If you want to know what the original Native Americans looked like you must
find pre 1920 pictures of them while they were some what isolated from Europeans
and Negroes, either on reservations or in "Indian Schools".
People have and will continue endless forgeries to push some crock. Your best
documentation of what Native Americans looked like will be from publications
copy written before 1950.
Original copies of these publications can be found and compared with pictures
people claim came from the past.
***
Negro clan of black racist, tell us the native Americans are their descendants? Decide for yourself.
The statue on the bottom, lower left is supposed to come
out of Africa between 200 and 500 BC. If it is not a fake,
this is a reflection of what Africans perceived Africans to look like.
(before mixing with Europeans). There appears to be too much craftsmanship
compared from other works I have seen early Africans create so I am guessing it
is a forgery.
The native American picture was gray scale (termed black and white) so I had to
have the Negro in gray scale so you could not guess which was the native
American based on the other picture being in color.
In this picture I began by removing actual clothing so you
could not tell the men apart by what they wore.
The hair is actually how it looked in the photographs. I had to giggle wondering
how the one guy got his hair to stick up like that.
I used the same body for both guys.
One of the guys is a Negro and the other is a Native
American. If I have to tell you which is which then I have proven nothing to you.

These were the skin colors of all Africans and native
Americans before the Europeans began to pollute their gene pool.
As there were no "whites" in the middle east, there were no whites in
the Americas, Africa, Australia ... NO where on earth except for Europe.
Isn't it quite the sham the cult of white European claim they are the
descendants of the natives of the middle east when you could not pick any of
them out of a line up of any other white Europeans.
You will see the colors of this European in the paintings of early Europeans
before they sailed to the Americas.
You will find the colors of Polynesians, Negroes, native Americans in the
paintings of the Europeans ... when non Europeans were painted they were painted
brown/black.
When Europeans were painted.. well I can show you a whole bunch of 500 year old
European paintings.
From this picture you can tell Negroes from Native
Americans .. and you could tell the "Jew" from both, but
you can not tell the "Jew" from any other European (unless you
have seen him on the news and know who he is).
They call themselves Jews (assertion they are descendants of natives of the
middle east) and yet they have the faces of their Druid ancestors, how could
that be?
zendz